For 40 years, ILSR has been advocating for human-scaled institutions that foster environmentally sound and socially equitable communities. Largely, they focus on research and policy as key drivers of progress in these areas. ILSR leader, Stacy Mitchell, delivers a thought-provoking (you guessed it...) TED talk, encouraging environmental and community visionaries to think beyond the actions of individuals. She explains that we need to focus more on changing the policies that influence economic development in our communities. She speaks to the common tendency to focus on isolated, individual action only:
"I put a lot of my making-the-world-a-better-place energy into thinking about how I can be a better consumer. You know, fair trade coffee, recycled toilet paper...the primary and often exclusive way we think about our agency in the world now is as consumers. But as consumers, we are very weak. We are operating as lone individuals making a series of choices and the most we can do is pick between the options that are presented to us."She goes on to compellingly illustrate that we (individual activists) are, "swimming upstream against a powerful down-current of public policies that are taking our economy in exactly the opposite direction."
She concludes, "...how do we begin to see our trips to the farmers market and to the local bookstore, not as the answer, but as a first step? How do we transform this remarkable consumer trend into something more? How do we make it a political movement?"
These are questions I need to think more carefully about. As much as I detest politics, I know Stacy is 100% correct in her assertions. More active political involvement should be my next focus if I want to affect real change. With some polite prodding reminders to register back in September, I did manage to turn out to the polls last week...a good start, right? But far from the end of the line.
Here are the policy items that ILSR recommends for equitable and sustainable community economic development:
- Stop subsidizing the corporate economy (AKA amazon needs to pay taxes too)
- Restructure the financial system to operate at a community scale (AKA four giant banks should not hold more than 40% of assets -- as they do currently)
- Adopt planning policies that create great habitat for local businesses (AKA walkable cities!)
- Enforce strong competition policies (AKA one dairy company shouldn't process 40% of the nations milk supply -- as it does currently)
- Shift spending by public institutions (AKA public purchases should reflect our community values)
- Make targeted local economy investments (AKA help communities fill resource gaps when/where possible)
Still, the path forward remains somewhat unclear. Am I the only one who feels intimidated by political involvement? There is so much to learn! Friends, where do you turn to educate yourself and how have you joined a political movement for a cause you are passionate about? Are you in any type of advocacy group focusing on changing policies? Do you write letters to your representatives? How often do you think Barack checks his Twitter? Just kidding on that last one, but I really do need to make a plan for engaging in the political sphere...so help a girl out!

Great post. Getting involved politically is intimating. For me, I think about how I don't have the time. I voted in the election, too, but it doesn't feel like enough. I applied for a position to be an advocate intern at Mother Hubbard's Cupboard, but they didn't get the funding and had to drop the position. I am ready to be an advocate, but at this point in my life I feel like I need to get paid for it, or get something in return. Although that is probably just an excuse, it is preventing me from doing anything. It is easy to feel defeated, which I think also keeps me from doing things politically. Great questions and I loved the TED talk.
ReplyDeleteDana great to see you dabbling in politics!! I really like ILSR's policy recommendations. I think they are really pertinent to our conversation today about big box food stores. I would love to see our agriculture policy shift from subsiding monoculture farms of corn and soybeans to subsidizing fruits and vegetables. I think this has the potential to greatly increase the amount of local producers and enable them to get their products into more stores. Lower prices also means that low-income (and most people just in general) will choose these foods over low nutrition packaged foods.
ReplyDeleteIn my social media class, we are talking about how these tools were not designed for politics or education, but for communication and leisure. Yet increasingly these platforms are being adjusted for students (consumer) needs. Even on twitter, based on my following for SPEAv515 I ended up following a few other organizations that post several sustainable concerns or movements (per hour) and I have honestly become a little jaded by it. (Come on, 6 posts at the exact same time by the same person? I'm skimming it, if that) But for these box corporations, or for our communities where citizens want to enact change, these platforms might just be the key to connect them. Just be wary--studies show that social media platforms are great for educating/sharing information, but do very little to actually get individuals physically involved.
ReplyDeleteNice Post, Dana. This post reminds me of our discussion about Walmart in class the other day. I liked the point that Laura brought up about the "illusion of choice"... and I think we see this because of the subsidization of the corporate sector. This was pointed out in the aforementioned policy items. Let's subsidize communities and people!
ReplyDeleteI’ve been somewhat (emphasis on the somewhat) involved with the Sierra Club up in Indianapolis. They have several different camps you can fall into, from crafting policies to going door to door and phonebanking. I’m not sure of specific advocacy organizations for the policies the ILSR spelled out, though I am sure they exist. If something is ridiculous enough, there are usually enough people ticked off by it to start organizing. Also, you can always get involved on a campaign for your favorite respective multi-billion dollar self-serving political party! ‘Murrica!
ReplyDeleteThat's so true, we do tend to measure our sustainability and involvement based off of our consumer choices. I guess it goes to show that capitalism and consumerist cultures are so deeply ingrained in our lives that we can't really separate them from our decisions or think of many alternatives. What is the real answer to "what is the opposite of capitalism"? Everyone sits silently. Political engagement is pretty intimidating, you're not alone in that. Americans are pretty apathetic overall; we don't vote in the polls, we vote at the stores. Complacency doesn't inspire change, but I'm sure eventually our system might fully collapse and bring a wake up call?
ReplyDelete